NFL Football News

:In many respects, the last week of the NFL regular season is different than the 16 pro football weekends that precede it. Not that it should cause handicappers to go into a state of panic. Indeed, adherence to traditional forecasting principles (such as identifying strengths and weaknesses of each side, fundamental matchups, personnel situations, psychological and technical considerations) is recommended as always.

But we might suggest altering the usual recipe just a bit for this week.

That’s because the last week of the NFL season often will more resemble the preseason than a normal regular-season weekend. Much like handicapping exhibition games, we suggest paying extra attention to personnel developments and lineup moves, especially involving quarterbacks (most announced in advance), leading up to the games. Keep in mind that several Week 17 contests will have no bearing on the standings or playoff picture. And it’s often the playoff-bound teams, especially those that can’t improve their postseason seeding prospects, that experiment the most as they attempt to avoid extra any injuries of consequence before the knockout rounds commence.

But here is where it often gets tricky, and when a “working knowledge” of the teams often comes in handy. How will a squad respond if its backup QB is taking the snaps, often surrounded by other reserves getting a rare chance to perform? Even if a team isn’t compelled to win, will it still focus on victory, or will care little about the much-discussed (and arguably overrated) “momentum” heading into the playoffs?

Unfortunately, recent history doesn’t provide a clear road map of what to expect in the final regular-season week. A year ago, many playoff-bound teams, as usual, rested several starters (including QBs) in Week 17 action, with mixed results. Denver, assured of the 2nd seed in the AFC, used limited starting QB Jake Plummer’s snaps and went with backup Bradlee Van Pelt the entire 2nd half, yet was still sharp and focused when winning 23-7 at San Diego. Jacksonville, locked into the 5th seed in the AFC, subbed liberally and played little-used QB Quinn Gray extensively, yet still whipped Tennessee, 40-13. On the other hand, Chicago low-keyed it at Minnesota and was whipped by the Vikings, 34-10. New England sat QB Tom Brady early for little-used Matt Cassel and ended up losing to visiting underdog Miami. NFC top seed Seattle also didn’t risk QB Matt Hasselbeck for more than a couple of series in its 23-17 loss at Green Bay (in which HC Mike Holmgren’s well-advertised lineup moves caused a dramatic pointspread shift, the Seahawks ending up a decided underdog at Lambeau Field).

The mention of dramatic pointspread shifts (such as last year’s Seahawks-Packers game) brings up another interesting Week 17 factor—must-win games don’t necessarily mean must-wager games. Examples abound over the years, including last season, when Pittsburgh was in a must-win situation in last season’s finale vs. the visiting Lions, and the spread mushroomed to over 2 TDs prior to kickoff. The Steelers won, 35-21, but it wasn’t as easy as the masses expected it would be, and they failed to cover the number in the process

Detroit’s effort in that game vs. Pittsburgh last season provides another example of Week 17 dynamics—don’t automatically assume a team doesn’t care about winning a game. This is especially true of non-playoff bound squads which would seem to have little to play for in the final week (such as the Lions a year ago). Except for the fact that pro football is the livelihood for the players, and future employment depends upon their performance. That’s why we’ve rarely subscribed to the “lose to get a higher draft choice” argument we hear every season. Coaches of such lower-rung teams are rarely motivated to lose another game and put their own jobs in further jeopardy. And rest assured that players on a losing team could care less about next season’s high draft choices who might take their place on the squad. Indeed, there are probably more examples of losing teams winning down the stretch, and thus worsening their draft position the following spring, than vice versa. Look no further than a year ago, when San Francisco was in “pole position” for the number one draft choice entering the last two weeks of the season, only to beat the Rams and Texans and slide down to the 6th position in the draft. In the past, we can recall sides such as the 1968 Eagles winning twice late in the season and denying themselves a chance to draft the ballyhooed O.J. Simpson (who ended up with the Bills), and the 1988 Packers winning an otherwise meaningless regular-season finale at Arizona, allowing the Cowboys to draft Troy Aikman with the first pick instead.

Bad teams can often find various ways to beat themselves. But it’s never because they’re not trying to win. The front office might have different ideas, but rest assured one of the last things on a player’s mind is being on a team that’s “first on the clock” for next spring’s draft!

NFL Football Related Articles

Return To Articles Archive